ScienceQ Publishing GroupScienceQ Publishing Group
  • Home
  • Submit Manuscript
    • Open Access
  • List of Journals
  • Policies and Ethics
  • Contact Us

Evaluation the Effect of Different Sprue Shapes on Some of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Casting Alloys

HomeEvaluation the Effect of Different Sprue Shapes on Some of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Casting Alloys

Research Article

Evaluation the Effect of Different Sprue Shapes on Some of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Casting Alloys

Maryam S. Alallak, Ihab Nafaa Yassen

Corresponding Author : Maryam S. Alallak

Prosthodentic Department, Health Techncal College, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Email ID : zainabsabeeh76@gmail.com

Received : 2018-12-22 Accepted : 2019-02-05 Published : 2019-02-05

Abstract : Sprue design is a factor that controls the velocity and adequate supply of metal to the mold. Currently various manufacturers recommend different sprue design, which have not been advocated in textbooks and literature is lacking for their routine applications. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the marginal fit and surface roughness by comparing between four sprue Design. Part I of the study determined marginal fit of base ceramometal crowns with the use of phosphate bonded investment. Stainless steel metal die was used and four sprue shapes (Group A cylinder, Group B Square, Group C bottle neck D conical) were evaluated. 40 stone die were made, 10 wax patterns for each sprue design were waxed up, invested with phosphate bonded investment material and castings done with centrifugal casting machine by the same operator under standardized protocols. The casting core Fit on the respective die and .margin on digital microscope evaluation. Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed with 1 way ANOVA followed By Student ‘t’ test. Part II used AFM microscope to evaluate the surface roughness of casting disc made with same techniques as Part I. For margin gap: The results differed significantly (P <0.0001) ) between the Groups with maximum defects in the castings of Group A followed in decreasing order by Group B, Group C and Group D. When comparing between the Groups (P <0.05) the gap in Groups B, C and D was significantly lower than Group A. For surface roughness results differed significantly (P <0.0001) ) between the Groups with maximum defects(roughness) in the castings of Group C followed in decreasing order by Group A, Group B and Group D. When comparing between the Groups (P <0.05) the defects in Groups C and A was significantly higher than Group Band D. Conical with flared point of attachment sprues produced most satisfactory margin fit and surface roughness ,meanwhile the cylinder without reservoir produced maximum defect in margin gap and surface roughness.

Keywords : Casting Alloys, Sprue design, prosthodontics, digital microscope evaluation

Citation : Maryam S. Alallak et al (2019). Evaluation the Effect of Different Sprue Shapes on Some of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Casting Alloys, J. of Advancement in Engineering and Technology, V7I2.03. DOI : 10.5281/zenodo.2575491

Copyright : © 2019 Maryam S. Alallak . This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Journal of Advancement in Engineering and Technology

ISSN : 2348-2931

Volume 7 / Issue 2

ScienceQ Publishing Group

Download Article

Reviewer Comments : Reviewers comments section of this article will get update shortly.

February 22, 2019
admin
Issue 2, JAET, Volume 7
No Comments
Submit Online
Article Structuring Guideline
Instruction for Author pdf
Policies and Ethics

 

pdf Copyright Form docx

Archives
  • JABZ
    • Volume 1
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 2
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • volume 3
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 4
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • volume 5
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • volume 6
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 7
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 8
      • Issue 1
  • JAET
    • Volume 1
      • Issue 1
      • Issue-2
      • Issue-3
      • Issue-4
    • Volume 2
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 3
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 4
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 5
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • volume 6
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 7
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 8
      • Issue 1
  • JALS
    • Volume 1
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 2
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 3
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 4
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 5
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 6
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 7
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 8
      • Issue 1
  • JBCE
    • Volume 1
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 2
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 3
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
  • JCLS
    • Volume 1
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
    • Volume 2
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 3
    • Volume 3
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
  • JMDDR
    • Volume 1
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 2
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 3
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 4
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 5
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
  • JPCS
    • Volume 1
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 2
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 3
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 4
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 5
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 6
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
    • Volume 7
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
  • Home
  • Submit Manuscript
  • List of Journals
  • Policies and Ethics
  • Contact Us
© ScienceQ Publishing Group 2023. All Rights Reserved.
SciencQ Publishing Group
Show Buttons
Hide Buttons
  • Home
  • Submit Manuscript
    • Open Access
  • List of Journals
  • Policies and Ethics
  • Contact Us